On Wed, Aug 20, 2025, at 18:49, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Your alias with the same name as a real command is silently ignored, > and when the real command disappears, it will start working. That’s what I intended to mean. > Having said that, as "log --raw" is even shorter to type than > "whatchanged", these people are really better off without such an > alias. I’m wondering based on the emails so far if the error message should spell out that (1) you can help yourself beyond reporting i-still-use-this and specifically that (2) there is a git-log(1) equivalent (like git-whatchanged(1) says). The message itself reads like it could be read like: tell us and we might put the brakes on removing it (and that’s it). -- still my
