"Kristoffer Haugsbakk" <kristofferhaugsbakk@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > The message itself reads like it could be read like: tell us and we > might put the brakes on removing it (and that’s it). Yeah, that is a wrong interpretation we did not want to trigger. "If you are a developer of a script that uses whatchanged, then rewrite it with 'log --raw --no-merges' and be happy. If the script is very widely used, dropping us a note would be nice, as we can redirect end-user inquiries of your script towards you. If you are an end-user of such a script, bug your supplier of such a script. Thanks." perhaps?
