Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] pack-bitmap: fix memory leak if load_bitmap() failed

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Taylor Blau <me@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> In c11c3b5681 (Documentation/SubmittingPatches: What's Acked-by and
> Tested-by?, 2008-02-03) you added:
>
>     Notice that you can place your own Signed-off-by: line when
>     forwarding somebody else's patch [...]. Indeed you are encouraged
>     to do so.  [...]
>
> and that text survives into the current version of SubmittingPatches.
> So I think that while our documentation encourages people to add their
> own S-o-b to others' patches sent on their behalf, it doesn't
> explicitly require it.

It would not hurt that much if I pretended that I ignored what
Lidong forwarded and picked up your patch directly from the list,
only because what was forwarded was public.  If it were a privately
shared patch, sign-off is required, so we'd need to tighten the
language in the SubmittingPatches document, I think.

Thanks.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux