On Tue, May 13, 2025 at 12:24 AM Eric Sunshine <sunshine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, May 12, 2025 at 1:50 PM Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > K Jayatheerth <jayatheerthkulkarni2005@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > @@ -1404,11 +1405,20 @@ static int do_create_stash(const struct pathspec *ps, struct strbuf *stash_msg_b > > > + if (flags & REF_ISSYMREF) { > > > + const char *tmp = NULL; > > > + if (skip_prefix(branch_ref, "refs/heads/", &tmp)) > > > + branch_name_buf = xstrdup(tmp); > > > + } > > > + if (branch_name_buf) > > > + branch_name = branch_name_buf; > > > + else > > > + branch_name = "(no branch)"; > > > + > > > + head_short_sha1 = repo_find_unique_abbrev(the_repository, > > > + &head_commit->object.oid, > > > + DEFAULT_ABBREV); > > > strbuf_addf(&msg, "%s: %s ", branch_name, head_short_sha1); > > > pp_commit_easy(CMIT_FMT_ONELINE, head_commit, &msg); > > > > Funny indentation, and branch_name_buf needs to be free'ed after use > > but other than that, nice digging! > > This change should also be accompanied by a new test to verify the > fixed behavior, right? I will be writing a patch series after checking CI and include tests, the only reason I sent this patch was if the bug reporter needed an immediate fix. Will send a new patch with test case and improved indentation Thanks for pointing it out -Jayatheerth