Re: [PATCH] stash: fix incorrect branch name in stash message

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, May 12, 2025 at 1:50 PM Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> K Jayatheerth <jayatheerthkulkarni2005@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> > @@ -1404,11 +1405,20 @@ static int do_create_stash(const struct pathspec *ps, struct strbuf *stash_msg_b
> > +     if (flags & REF_ISSYMREF) {
> > +             const char *tmp = NULL;
> > +             if (skip_prefix(branch_ref, "refs/heads/", &tmp))
> > +                     branch_name_buf = xstrdup(tmp);
> > +     }
> > +             if (branch_name_buf)
> > +                     branch_name = branch_name_buf;
> > +             else
> > +                     branch_name = "(no branch)";
> > +
> > +             head_short_sha1 = repo_find_unique_abbrev(the_repository,
> > +                                                     &head_commit->object.oid,
> > +                                                     DEFAULT_ABBREV);
> >       strbuf_addf(&msg, "%s: %s ", branch_name, head_short_sha1);
> >       pp_commit_easy(CMIT_FMT_ONELINE, head_commit, &msg);
>
> Funny indentation, and branch_name_buf needs to be free'ed after use
> but other than that, nice digging!

This change should also be accompanied by a new test to verify the
fixed behavior, right?





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux