https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2363088 Jerry James <loganjerry@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |fedora-review? CC| |loganjerry@xxxxxxxxx Assignee|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |loganjerry@xxxxxxxxx Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #13 from Jerry James <loganjerry@xxxxxxxxx> --- I will take this review. (In reply to John Whitington from comment #5) > (Sidenote: I copied the %global debug_package %{nil} from here > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/OCaml/ so if > that's wrong, it wants updating...) Note that every instance of %global debug_package %{nil} in the guidelines looks like this: %ifnarch %{ocaml_native_compiler} %global debug_package %{nil} %endif That is, it applies only to bytecode-only architectures. OCaml packages without any C bindings do not create any ELF objects, so there is nothing to strip debuginfo out of. OCaml packages with C bindings should not use this, as there will still be a shared object that contains debuginfo even on bytecode-only architectures. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2363088 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202363088%23c13 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
