https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2353869 --- Comment #17 from Cristian Le <fedora@xxxxxxxxx> --- > What is the source of vdw-params.csv ? I had comments in the spec file about it, and I opened an upstream issue to get clarification about it. The earliest reference to it is here [1], but also there there is no clear note on where this comes from. > Additionally, mpi4py in Fedora can come from either python3-mpi4py-openmpi or python3-mpi4py-mpich This should not be an issue if the `PYTHONPATH` is adjusted during the module load. I did a quick check and I've found that that is not the case. But this is an issue we should address in the mpi4py package. Do you want to open an issue about it and maybe we can work on that. > Main problem is that some work is required for numpy>2 compatibility. Well, great, that seems like it will be a fun journey. Seems like it will take some time to even get a communication channel with them about these issues. [1]: https://github.com/libmbd/libmbd/commit/cfdcb29fe136b3c1e35fbe224224f9713f27f37c -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2353869 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202353869%23c17 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
