[Bug 2373038] Review Request: elementary-photos - Photo manager and viewer from elementary

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2373038

Steve Cossette <farchord@xxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |POST
              Flags|                            |fedora-review+



--- Comment #5 from Steve Cossette <farchord@xxxxxxxxx> ---
(In reply to Fabio Valentini from comment #4)
> Thank you for your comments!
> 
> > 1- You might want to implement fdupes in your spec. Adding it as a BR and doing %fdupes %{buildroot} will find all the duplicate files and symlink them, lowering the file size.
> 
> Why? I'm not aware of any large number of "duplicate" files in this package.
> Additionally, the current implementation of %fdupes is brittle and causes
> non-reproducible package builds, so I would rather avoid it unless it really
> provides big benefits.
> 

Yeah it's not a huge benefit, it's about a quarter of a megabyte. But there was
quite a few duplicates. I can forget about that though.

> > 2- This should probably be looked into: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/licenses/elementary-photos/COPYING (At least a PR might be a good idea)
> 
> Thanks, I'll report this upstream. It shouldn't be a blocker though.

Right, it isn't.
> 
> > 3- The following should probably be added as Requires:
> 
> As far as I can tell, this is just a weird way that meson prints output when
> looking for dependencies.
> 
> The executable in this package already dynamically links to all these
> libraries, so RPM already generates explicit Requires for all of them (as
> you can see from the build.log or the Requires in the fedora-review.txt).

Yeah I guess you're right, I just missed it.

With the issue with the license reported upstream, a local build/install
worked, and everything looks good to me.

So this review is approved!


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2373038

Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202373038%23c5

-- 
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux