Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Aug 15, 2025 at 7:49 AM Milan Crha <mcrha@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2025-08-14 at 19:32 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > > I think bijiben and gtksourceview4 are suspicious and maybe
> > > orphaned in error.
>
>         Hi again,
> okay, I want the gnome-sig to take over the bijiben package. I took
> over the bijiben package, which made me the main admin and it also
> preserved my commit access (my nick had two entries there). I did set
> the gnome-sig as a (co-)maintainer. I thought when I'll orphan it again
> the gnome-sig will take over, but it clearly does not work that way.
> More importantly, I lost both entries, the main admin and the commit
> access to that package. I suppose groups cannot be the main admins of
> the packages, can they?

Yes, groups cannot be the main point of contact / "main admin" ACL for
a package, only users.

Fabio
-- 
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux