Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2025-08-14 at 19:32 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > I think bijiben and gtksourceview4 are suspicious and maybe
> > orphaned in error.

	Hi again,
okay, I want the gnome-sig to take over the bijiben package. I took
over the bijiben package, which made me the main admin and it also
preserved my commit access (my nick had two entries there). I did set
the gnome-sig as a (co-)maintainer. I thought when I'll orphan it again
the gnome-sig will take over, but it clearly does not work that way.
More importantly, I lost both entries, the main admin and the commit
access to that package. I suppose groups cannot be the main admins of
the packages, can they?

I took bijiben (again), even I do not intend to be the main admin for
it. I had commit rights only to be able to rebuild it in case
evolution-data-server bumps its soname version. I'd like to give away
the main admin flag from me on that package, I'm definitely not going
to fix any of its bug reports.

	Bye,
	Milan

-- 
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux