Re: Is 'sharutils' still needed in Fedora?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Wed, Apr 9, 2025, at 11:52 AM, Lukas Javorsky wrote:
>>
>> As others mentioned uudecode and uuencode are still used in a lot of
>> places. I thought at one time they were outside of sharutils and hten
>> brought into the project later. Are they asking about the 'shar' part or
>> the 'uucode' part or both?
>

Is the main reason lack of maintainers?  Many of these C packages work well on constrained and embedded devices.

>
> I believe it's for both. Either way, we can deprecate only the whole
> package, not just a part. We can stop building the shar part, but if
> possible, the deprecation/retirement of the whole package is preferred.
>
> libarchive
>
>
> Dropped dependency on sharutils [1]
>
> [1] https://github.com/libarchive/libarchive/pull/2571
>
>
-- 
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux