Re: Builds and updates missing from Fedora 42 compared to Fedora 41

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2025/03/11 17:17, Fabio Valentini wrote:

On Tue, Mar 11, 2025 at 5:12 PM Michael J Gruber <mjg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Given the many packit related ones - does packit have a concept of
"follow Fedora release branching" (like COPR), or do packit users have
to update their config after a branch event?
Many projects have a packit config like "build for rawhide, f41, f40"
and of course that gets out of date at branch time.
To my knowledge, there is no automatic "follow branching" possible.

If configured properly the versions would not be in the `.packit.yaml`. Instead it would be aliases like `fedora-all`/`fedora-latest`. With F42 it was a bug on `fedora-distro-aliases` when the branch entered `frozen` [1], which was fixed since then.

[1]: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/fedora-distro-aliases/pull/25

-- 
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux