On Tue, Mar 11, 2025 at 5:12 PM Michael J Gruber <mjg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Fabio Valentini venit, vidit, dixit 2025-03-11 17:01:15: > > Hi all, > > > > It's this time of the year again. Looks like there's quite a few > > updates that were submitted to Fedora 41 but not to Fedora 42 and / or > > Rawhide. > > > > Some seem to be either caused by confusion about the ongoing freeze, > > but a lot are just ... missing. And packit seems to be a major > > offender here. > > > > Full list of package downgrades from Fedora 41 -> 42 included below. > > > > Please take a look and fix things. We don't want users to get > > downgraded to older package versions on upgrade from Fedora 41 to 42. > > Given the many packit related ones - does packit have a concept of > "follow Fedora release branching" (like COPR), or do packit users have > to update their config after a branch event? Many projects have a packit config like "build for rawhide, f41, f40" and of course that gets out of date at branch time. To my knowledge, there is no automatic "follow branching" possible. > Also, does packit "gate" in the sense: > > build on rawhide && push to F42 || warn user > > Otherwise, packit should be considered harmful ;-) Packit opens a separate PR for every branch, so this should not be a problem. Fabio -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
