Re: Builds and updates missing from Fedora 42 compared to Fedora 41

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Fabio Valentini venit, vidit, dixit 2025-03-11 17:01:15:
> Hi all,
> 
> It's this time of the year again. Looks like there's quite a few
> updates that were submitted to Fedora 41 but not to Fedora 42 and / or
> Rawhide.
> 
> Some seem to be either caused by confusion about the ongoing freeze,
> but a lot are just ... missing. And packit seems to be a major
> offender here.
> 
> Full list of package downgrades from Fedora 41 -> 42 included below.
> 
> Please take a look and fix things. We don't want users to get
> downgraded to older package versions on upgrade from Fedora 41 to 42.

Given the many packit related ones - does packit have a concept of
"follow Fedora release branching" (like COPR), or do packit users have
to update their config after a branch event?

Also, does packit "gate" in the sense:

build on rawhide && push to F42 || warn user

Otherwise, packit should be considered harmful ;-)

Cheers
Michael
-- 
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux