Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Fri, 2025-07-25 at 14:10 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >> So ... any chance you have a data type named _sa_setup_role? > ... it could also be a type "sa_setup_role", and "_sa_setup_role" > is interpreted as the corresponding array type: Oh, of course --- that's a good deal more likely than my version. regards, tom lane
