Rumpi Gravenstein <rgravens@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > Our databases are deployed with automation tools. They should all be > created the same. They all have the same 17 extensions. I've asked a DBA > to confirm. Well, there's got to be *something* different about that database. > This issue only appears in the function I have listed. A similar function, > same contents and parameter but with a different name, works the way I > would expect. That sure seems like evidence in favor of the similarly-named-function idea. But I don't see how the DROP FUNCTION wouldn't have failed if there were two, nor why we wouldn't see it in \df. regards, tom lane
