On Wed, Apr 23, 2025 at 02:06:05PM +0200, Florian Westphal wrote: > Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Yes, I didn't notice either. Anyway, unless you can forecast any > > issue, I'd suggest to backport the entire patch? IIRC patch is > > relatively small and keeping it in sync with main could possibly help > > with cherrypicking fixes. > > Right, it would keep -stable "bug compatible" too. > > Maybe its ok to ask to cherry-pick it as is for > 6.14 and 6.12. OK, let's request this cherry-pick for 6.12. Thanks > 6.13 is EOL already, 6.12 is longterm. > > This would leave 6.6 and 6.1 longterm out but from lack > of bug reports so far I would not say its a prominent bug. > > The upstream patch cherry-picks for all except 6.1.y, but > AFAICS its just a simple context conflict. > > Earlier longterm kernels aren't affected.
