Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Yes, I didn't notice either. Anyway, unless you can forecast any > issue, I'd suggest to backport the entire patch? IIRC patch is > relatively small and keeping it in sync with main could possibly help > with cherrypicking fixes. Right, it would keep -stable "bug compatible" too. Maybe its ok to ask to cherry-pick it as is for 6.14 and 6.12. 6.13 is EOL already, 6.12 is longterm. This would leave 6.6 and 6.1 longterm out but from lack of bug reports so far I would not say its a prominent bug. The upstream patch cherry-picks for all except 6.1.y, but AFAICS its just a simple context conflict. Earlier longterm kernels aren't affected.
