Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > + if (iter->count < iter->skip) {
> > + iter->count++;
> > + continue;
> > + }
>
> Not causing any harm, but is iter->count useful for this
> NFT_ITER_UPDATE variant?
>
> I think iter->count is only used for netlink dumps, to resume from the
> last netlink message.
Yes. Should I just remove the above or also add a WARN_ON_ONCE(iter->skip) ...
> > + switch (iter->type) {
> > + case NFT_ITER_UPDATE:
... here?
