Florian Westphal <fw@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Not causing any harm, but is iter->count useful for this
> > NFT_ITER_UPDATE variant?
> >
> > I think iter->count is only used for netlink dumps, to resume from the
> > last netlink message.
>
> Yes. Should I just remove the above or also add a WARN_ON_ONCE(iter->skip) ...
FTR, I removed the iterator and placed the WARN_ON_ONCE
> > > + switch (iter->type) {
> > > + case NFT_ITER_UPDATE:
here, then pushed this to nf-next:testing.
