On Tue, Jun 10, 2025 at 09:56:04AM +0200, Carlos Maiolino wrote:
> > - if (shadow->lv_buf_len == XFS_LOG_VEC_ORDERED)
> > - ordered = true;
> > + if (shadow->lv_buf_len == XFS_LOG_VEC_ORDERED) {
> > + if (!lv) {
> > + lv = shadow;
> > + lv->lv_item = lip;
> > + }
> > + ASSERT(shadow->lv_size == lv->lv_size);
>
> This assert is kind of confusing me. if we have an
> ORDERED vector here, couldn't we still have a shadow
> size smaller than the current vector?
The size of ordered items never changes, it's always the same constant
overhead.
