Re: [PATCH v2 15/15] xfs: test that we can handle spurious zone wp advancements

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 15/15] xfs: test that we can handle spurious zone wp advancements
From: Hans Holmberg <Hans.Holmberg@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 7 May 2025 06:05:27 +0000
Accept-language: en-GB, en-US
Cc: Zorro Lang <zlang@xxxxxxxxxx>, "djwong@xxxxxxxxxx" <djwong@xxxxxxxxxx>, "fstests@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <fstests@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20250507051206.GA28948@lst.de>
References: <20250501134302.2881773-16-hch@lst.de> <20250505095054.16030-1-hans.holmberg@wdc.com> <20250507051206.GA28948@lst.de>
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Wdcipoutbound: EOP-TRUE

On 07/05/2025 07:12, hch wrote:
> While testing the updates for the comments from Zorro, it turns out
> that this doesn't handle internal RT devices correctly.  Can you
> fix it up to handle that as well?
> 
> 

Argh. Yep, I'll fix it up and send it out separately.

References:
- [PATCH 15/15] xfs: test that we can handle spurious zone wp advancements
  - From: Christoph Hellwig
- [PATCH v2 15/15] xfs: test that we can handle spurious zone wp advancements
  - From: Hans Holmberg
- Re: [PATCH v2 15/15] xfs: test that we can handle spurious zone wp advancements
  - From: hch

Prev by Date: [PATCH 13/15] xfs: test zoned GC file defragmentation for random writers
Next by Date: [PATCH v4 0/1] xfs: Fail remount with noattr2 on a v5 xfs with v4 enabled kernel.
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH v2 15/15] xfs: test that we can handle spurious zone wp advancements
Next by thread: [PATCH 11/15] xfs: test zoned GC file defragmentation for sequential writers
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [XFS Filesystem Development (older mail)] [Linux Filesystem Development] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite Trails] [Linux Kernel] [Linux RAID] [Linux SCSI]

Powered by Linux