Re: [PATCH v2 15/15] xfs: test that we can handle spurious zone wp advancements

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 15/15] xfs: test that we can handle spurious zone wp advancements
From: hch <hch@xxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 7 May 2025 07:12:06 +0200
Cc: Zorro Lang <zlang@xxxxxxxxxx>, "djwong@xxxxxxxxxx" <djwong@xxxxxxxxxx>, "fstests@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <fstests@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, hch <hch@xxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20250505095054.16030-1-hans.holmberg@wdc.com>
References: <20250501134302.2881773-16-hch@lst.de> <20250505095054.16030-1-hans.holmberg@wdc.com>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)

While testing the updates for the comments from Zorro, it turns out
that this doesn't handle internal RT devices correctly.  Can you
fix it up to handle that as well?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH v2 15/15] xfs: test that we can handle spurious zone wp advancements
  - From: Hans Holmberg

References:
- [PATCH 15/15] xfs: test that we can handle spurious zone wp advancements
  - From: Christoph Hellwig
- [PATCH v2 15/15] xfs: test that we can handle spurious zone wp advancements
  - From: Hans Holmberg

Prev by Date: Re: Sequential read from NVMe/XFS twice slower on Fedora 42 than on Rocky 9.5
Next by Date: [PATCH 02/15] add a new rw_hint helper
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH v2 15/15] xfs: test that we can handle spurious zone wp advancements
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH v2 15/15] xfs: test that we can handle spurious zone wp advancements
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [XFS Filesystem Development (older mail)] [Linux Filesystem Development] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite Trails] [Linux Kernel] [Linux RAID] [Linux SCSI]

Powered by Linux