On Tue, Jun 17, 2025 at 10:20:38AM -0700, Joanne Koong wrote: > > Ah, ok. Are you fine with getting something that works for fuse first, > > and then we look into !CONFIG_BLOCK environments as a next step? > > I think the fuse iomap work has a hard dependency on the CONFIG_BLOCK > work else it would break backwards compatibility for fuse (eg > non-CONFIG_BLOCK environments wouldn't be able to compile/use fuse > anymore) Sure. What I mean is that I want to do this last before getting the series ready to merge. I.e. don't bother with until we have something we're all fine with on a conceptual level.
