Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 7/29/25 20:36, Ping-Ke Shih wrote:
> > Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> There are more unsupported functions than just LOWRT_RTY. Improve on
> >> commit 3b66519b023b ("wifi: rtw89: phy: add dummy c2h handler to avoid
> >> warning message") by printing a message just once when we first
> >> encounter an unsupported class.
> >
> > Once I encounter an unsupported class/func, I'll check firmware team if the
> > C2H events can be ignored. If so, I add a dummy function to avoid the message.
> > If not, I should add code to handle the event.
> >
> > Do you want to see the message even though it only appears once?
>
> I mean, maybe it should just be a debug? Are these messages useful for anyone
> other than the developers?
Yes, this could just be a debug. However, developers normally don't turn on
debug mask, so using rtw89_info is to clearly remind developers to pay
attention on this lack of C2H handler. And, I suppose developers must handle
this when they see flooding messages.
>
> Maybe we should just print only the very first unsupported message at info level
> and print the rest at debug.
I'm afraid developers will ignore or miss the messages. To reduce messages
is fine to me , but more important is to look up vendor driver to see if
the C2H handler is necessary.
