On 6/30/2025 12:43 AM, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
Subject has incorrect prefix, should be "wifi: ath11k: "
And ideally it should mention HAL SRNG since it is specific to that allocation
> Don't deinitialize and reinitialize the HAL helpers. The dma memory is
> deallocated and there is high possibility that we'll not be able to get
> the same memory allocated from dma when there is high memory pressure.
>
> Tested-on: WCN6855 WLAN.HSP.1.1-03926.13-QCAHSPSWPL_V2_SILICONZ_CE-2.52297.6
not quite the right format since it is missing hw version and bus
>
> Fixes: d5c65159f289 ("ath11k: driver for Qualcomm IEEE 802.11ax devices")
> Signed-off-by: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/core.c | 5 -----
> 1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/core.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/core.c
> index 4488e4cdc5e9e..bc4930fe6a367 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/core.c
> @@ -2213,14 +2213,9 @@ static int ath11k_core_reconfigure_on_crash(struct ath11k_base *ab)
> mutex_unlock(&ab->core_lock);
>
> ath11k_dp_free(ab);
> - ath11k_hal_srng_deinit(ab);
>
> ab->free_vdev_map = (1LL << (ab->num_radios * TARGET_NUM_VDEVS(ab))) - 1;
>
> - ret = ath11k_hal_srng_init(ab);
> - if (ret)
> - return ret;
> -
> clear_bit(ATH11K_FLAG_CRASH_FLUSH, &ab->dev_flags);
>
> ret = ath11k_core_qmi_firmware_ready(ab);
does this patch have any dependency upon the 1/3 patch?
if not, then it should be sent separately since it should go through the ath
tree instead of through the mhi tree.
/jeff
