On Thu, 2025-05-22 at 10:13 +0530, Sarika Sharma wrote: > > > Indeed, weird, why do we even bother counting them per AC? > > > > Currently, tx_packets and tx_bytes are maintained per AC only in mac80211. > I'm not entirely sure why this per-AC tracking was introduced, as I > haven't come across a specific use case that justifies maintaining these > metrics separately per AC. > > I also checked to see if there are any other parameters tracking > tx_packets and tx_bytes, but couldn't find any. > > Would you like me to consolidate tx_packets and tx_bytes instead of > maintaining them per AC? > Or should we consider this change separately as different patch? Let's say that's different and unrelated, maybe we had something accessing it in the past. johannes
