On 5/6/2025 10:37 PM, Jeff Johnson wrote: > On 5/6/2025 6:10 AM, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote: >> On 5/6/25 12:17 AM, Jeff Johnson wrote: >>> v2 feedback was not incorporated: >>> For starters, can we make the subject a bit more specific, i.e. >>> Fix MHI target memory reuse logic >>> >>> But don't repost for this -- I'll make that change in ath/pending >> I'd changed again on the request of another reviewer. Please feel free >> to change as you like. I don't have any opinion on it. >> >>> >>> However, does ath12k need the same fix? >> Looking at ath12k, there is similar code structure in >> ath12k_qmi_alloc_chunk(). By adding some logging, we can confirm if >> ath12k requires the fix or not. As a lot of code is similar in both >> drivers, ath12k may require the same fix. >> >> I don't have access to ath12k. So I cannot test on it. > > Baochen, do you want to propagate the change to ath12k? Yeah, I can test and fix if same issue is there.
