On 5/6/25 12:17 AM, Jeff Johnson wrote: > v2 feedback was not incorporated: > For starters, can we make the subject a bit more specific, i.e. > Fix MHI target memory reuse logic > > But don't repost for this -- I'll make that change in ath/pending I'd changed again on the request of another reviewer. Please feel free to change as you like. I don't have any opinion on it. > > However, does ath12k need the same fix? Looking at ath12k, there is similar code structure in ath12k_qmi_alloc_chunk(). By adding some logging, we can confirm if ath12k requires the fix or not. As a lot of code is similar in both drivers, ath12k may require the same fix. I don't have access to ath12k. So I cannot test on it. > If so, can you post a separate patch for that? > > /jeff -- Regards, Usama
