On Thu, 2025-04-24 at 14:04 -0500, Rob Herring wrote: > On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 1:39 PM Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Thu, 2025-04-24 at 13:26 -0500, Rob Herring wrote: > > > While it seems the reviews of the series caused more warnings for > > > Apple, in general, schemas creating warnings is not breaking things. > > > In a way, the whole point is to create warnings because if the .dts > > > files were perfect already we wouldn't need schemas. The main > > > requirement for schemas is only that they don't create warnings for > > > the examples. There's still too many for .dts files to worry about it > > > (and there's intermittent warnings from things getting merged via > > > different trees). > > > > > > > Oh, sure, but now if you want to apply the fixes you probably have to > > wait for the broken patches in my tree to percolate all the way through > > to Linus, then back to your tree, and then you can apply the fixes? > > No, I never take .dts changes. They all go via the individual platform > trees. It's a bit weird if Krzysztof refers to the commit that's not > in the linear history, but that shouldn't hold things up. The issues > exist with or without the schema change. They might even be backported > to stable while the schema change won't be. Ah. OK, so never mind then. I'll assume whatever Krzysztof did will go through some other tree and just go on with things :) Thanks for the explanations! johannes
