On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 10:42 AM Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu, 2025-04-24 at 17:37 +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > > > > > Thanks, I guess I'll hold the pull request for that. And I guess the > > > Apple ones are on David then. > > I think you can go ahead. I already referenced that commit from next in > > my patches, so I hope that SHA will not change (don't rebase your tree): > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-devicetree/?q=f%3Akrzysztof+%22Align+wifi+node+name+with+bindings%22 > > > > Hm. I thought this patchset broke it, and it is going through my tree. > Wouldn't it be much more complex for fixes on top of it to go through > another tree? While it seems the reviews of the series caused more warnings for Apple, in general, schemas creating warnings is not breaking things. In a way, the whole point is to create warnings because if the .dts files were perfect already we wouldn't need schemas. The main requirement for schemas is only that they don't create warnings for the examples. There's still too many for .dts files to worry about it (and there's intermittent warnings from things getting merged via different trees). Rob
