Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Mon, 2025-03-24 at 15:02 +0100, Remi Pommarel wrote: >> >> Finding a fix tag is not easy for this case because I am not sure which >> commit exactly introduced the issue. Is it the introduction of >> ieee80211_handle_wake_tx_queue() (i.e. c850e31f79f0) that allows packets >> queued on another dev to be processed or the one that introduced >> ieee80211_tx_dequeue() (i.e. bb42f2d13ffc) ? >> >> I would have said the latter, what do you think ? > > I would agree, despite saying "Move ..." that called > ieee80211_tx_h_select_key() twice, once in invoke_tx_handlers_early() > before queueing the frame, and again in ieee80211_tx_dequeue(). Yeah, agreed :) -Toke
