On Mon, 2025-03-24 at 15:02 +0100, Remi Pommarel wrote: > > Finding a fix tag is not easy for this case because I am not sure which > commit exactly introduced the issue. Is it the introduction of > ieee80211_handle_wake_tx_queue() (i.e. c850e31f79f0) that allows packets > queued on another dev to be processed or the one that introduced > ieee80211_tx_dequeue() (i.e. bb42f2d13ffc) ? > > I would have said the latter, what do you think ? I would agree, despite saying "Move ..." that called ieee80211_tx_h_select_key() twice, once in invoke_tx_handlers_early() before queueing the frame, and again in ieee80211_tx_dequeue(). johannes
