On 23/08/2025 19:27, Denzeel Oliva wrote: >> This looks like a massive ABI break, where is the justification for >> doing it? >> >> Cheers, >> Conor. > > Hi Conor, > > I reordered because the current IDs don’t match CMU_TOP: > the PLL mux select is in PLL_CON0, not CON3, which gave wrong/low rates. IDs are abstract, they cannot give wrong/low rates. > I also added DPU/CMUREF and a missing fixed-factor path to stop bad rates > and clk_summary hangs on hardware. Not really related to ABI. None of these justify changing the ABI or I don't understand the problem at all. Best regards, Krzysztof
