Re: [PATCH] scsi: ufs: exynos: fsd: Gate ref_clk and put UFS device in reset on suspend

[Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@xxxxxxx>]

On 8/4/25 4:36 AM, Bharat Uppal wrote:
> +static int fsd_ufs_suspend(struct exynos_ufs *ufs)
> +{
> +	exynos_ufs_gate_clks(ufs);
> +	hci_writel(ufs, 0 << 0, HCI_GPIO_OUT);
> +	return 0;
> +}

Why '0 << 0' instead of just '0'? Isn't the latter easier to read?

Thanks,

Bart.