Hi,
During static analysis with Smatch, I identified the following issue:
```
drivers/memory/samsung/exynos-srom.c:155 exynos_srom_probe()
warn: 'srom->reg_base' from of_iomap() not released on lines: 155.
```
Problem analysis:
1. In exynos_srom_probe(), the reg_base resource is acquired via of_iomap()
2. The of_platform_populate() call at the end of the function has a
possible failure path:
```
root = root ? of_node_get(root) : of_find_node_by_path("/");
if (!root)
return -EINVAL; // Failure return point
```
3. When this path is taken, reg_base is not released, causing a resource
leak
Verification:
After applying the patch, the Smatch warning is resolved
Best regards,
Zhen
在 2025/7/31 17:06, Krzysztof Kozlowski 写道:
On 31/07/2025 10:33, Zhen Ni wrote:
The current error handling in exynos_srom_probe() has a resource leak
in the of_platform_populate() failure path. When this function fails
after successful resource allocation, srom->reg_base is not released.
To fix this issue, replace of_iomap() with
devm_platform_ioremap_resource(). devm_platform_ioremap_resource()
is a specialized function for platform devices.
Don't explain us kernel code. Drop sentence.
It allows 'srom->reg_base' to be automatically released whether the
probe function succeeds or fails.
It's obvious.
Besides, use IS_ERR() instead of !srom->reg_base
I don't understand this. You keep explaining the code and this suggests
you made change here not related to original case. Can you return
srom->reg_base here? No?
as the return value of devm_platform_ioremap_resource()
can either be a pointer to the remapped memory or
an ERR_PTR() encoded error code if the operation fails.
Missing fixes and cc-stable.
Signed-off-by: Zhen Ni <zhen.ni@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/memory/samsung/exynos-srom.c | 10 ++++------
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/memory/samsung/exynos-srom.c b/drivers/memory/samsung/exynos-srom.c
index e73dd330af47..d913fb901973 100644
--- a/drivers/memory/samsung/exynos-srom.c
+++ b/drivers/memory/samsung/exynos-srom.c
@@ -121,20 +121,18 @@ static int exynos_srom_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
return -ENOMEM;
srom->dev = dev;
- srom->reg_base = of_iomap(np, 0);
- if (!srom->reg_base) {
+ srom->reg_base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource(pdev, 0);
+ if (IS_ERR(srom->reg_base)) {
dev_err(&pdev->dev, "iomap of exynos srom controller failed\n");
- return -ENOMEM;
+ return PTR_ERR(srom->reg_base);
How did you test it?
Best regards,
Krzysztof