On 01/07/2025 15:35, Shradha Todi wrote: >>> does not support auto adaptation so we need to tune the PHYs >>> according to the use case (considering channel loss, etc). This is why we >> >> So not same? Decide. Either it is same or not, cannot be both. >> >> If you mean that some wiring is different on the board, then how does it >> differ in soc thus how it is per-soc property? If these are use-cases, >> then how is even suitable for DT? >> >> I use your Tesla FSD differently and then I exchange DTSI and compatibles? >> >> You are no describing real problem and both binding and your >> explanations are vague and imprecise. Binding tells nothing about it, so >> it is example of skipping important decisions. >> >>> have 2 different SW PHY initialization sequence depending on the instance >>> number. Do you think having different compatible (something like >>> tesla,fsd-pcie-phy0 and tesla,fsd-pcie-phy1) and having phy ID as platform data >>> is okay in this case? I actually took reference from files like: >> >> And in different use case on same soc you are going to reverse >> compatibles or instance IDs? >> > > Even though both the PHYs are exactly identical in terms of hardware, > they need to be programmed/initialized/configured differently. > > Sorry for my misuse of the word "use-case". To clarify, these configurations > will always remain the same for FSD SoC even if you use it differently. > > I will use different compatibles for them as I understand that it is the best > option. I still do not see the difference in hardware explained. Best regards, Krzysztof
