Hi Alexandre, On Thu, 2025-04-17 at 17:42 +0200, Alexandre Belloni wrote: > On 15/04/2025 17:02:12+0100, Lee Jones wrote: > > > drivers/mfd/Kconfig | 35 +- > > > drivers/mfd/Makefile | 5 +- > > > drivers/mfd/sec-acpm.c | 442 +++++++++++++++++++ > > > drivers/mfd/sec-common.c | 301 +++++++++++++ > > > drivers/mfd/sec-core.c | 481 --------------------- > > > drivers/mfd/sec-core.h | 23 + > > > drivers/mfd/sec-i2c.c | 239 ++++++++++ > > > drivers/mfd/sec-irq.c | 460 +++++++------------- > > > > > drivers/rtc/rtc-s5m.c | 197 ++++++--- > > > > MFD parts look okay to me now. > > > > With Acks from the Clk and RTC maintainers, I can merge all of the > > driver stuff together and submit a PR for others to pull from. > > > > I don't think the RTC part depends on the MFD one so I was going to > apply the patches in my tree if this is fine for everyone. RTC patch 27 does depend on the s2mpg10 mfd core driver (due to using enums and macros introduced there). Patches 25. 26, 28, 29, 30, 31 indeed don't strictly depend on the MFD changes. Without patch 27 in place, patches 25 & 25 will definitely still apply, and patches 28++ will probably apply. If you want to take them, I can then rebase this series if you think that's better. I'll do whatever is preferred, just let me know :-) Cheers, Andre'
