Hi Morimoto-san,
On Thu, 15 May 2025 at 00:56, Kuninori Morimoto
<kuninori.morimoto.gx@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > However, renaming config symbols always comes with its own set of
> > > pains: users must notice and adapt when updating their own configs,
> > > and I do have to manage the non-upstream renesas_defconfig, too.
> > > What about dropping the rename part? The symbols that currently lack
> > > a RENESAS-prefix do have fairly unique family prefixes.
> (snip)
> > I agreed with Geert off-list that merging
> > renesas-arm-defconfig-for-v6.16-tag2 into the pwm tree and apply the
> > patch is fine for him.
>
> It seems the patch was applied (?)
>
> If so, I have a plan to post patch for renesas_defconfig to update
> symbols. I'm thinking I will post it after next merge window,
> but please let me know if I can post it immediately.
You can send it now, but I cannot apply it before the Kconfig
changes are upstream. I do have to update renesas_defconfig in next
renesas-drivers release anyway, as usual (cfr. the top 3 commits in
renesas-drivers), so I can take it there.
Thanks!
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
