Hi Wolfram,
On Thu, 17 Apr 2025 at 10:52, Wolfram Sang
<wsa+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Because these LEDs are not connected to a device and have only a single
> color, we don't need to specify 'color' and 'function' to distinguish
> them. Even worse, that would lead to namespace collisions:
>
> leds-gpio leds: Led green:programming renamed to green:programming_1 due to name collision
> leds-gpio leds: Led green:programming renamed to green:programming_2 due to name collision
> leds-gpio leds: Led green:programming renamed to green:programming_3 due to name collision
> leds-gpio leds: Led green:programming renamed to green:programming_4 due to name collision
> leds-gpio leds: Led green:programming renamed to green:programming_5 due to name collision
> leds-gpio leds: Led green:programming renamed to green:programming_6 due to name collision
> leds-gpio leds: Led green:programming renamed to green:programming_7 due to name collision
>
> So, just let their node name (taken from the schematics) be used as a
> name.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Changes since v1:
> * renamed nodes to match schematics
> * added default-state
> * updated commit message why not more LED properties are used
Thanks for the update!
You could still add the color properties without function properties.
However, the "function-enumerator" property exists to avoid the collisions.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
