Hi Krzysztof, > We do not speak about same things. I speak of review being ignored for > multiple revisions in one patchset and then another patchset sending > exactly the same pattern. True, we are talking about two different things... > Each of these contributors were not changing here anything, it's like > not their job. It looks like this will never get fixed, because each > person wants to just get their stuff merged, so let's ignore the > reviewers comments. ... this is the technical part where you are correct. I am not arguing against it and the issue is currently being worked on as I write this mail. Then, there is the communicative part which got me. A response like "NAK, I am not applying this until you finally fix the issue. And I am getting angry for being ignored the n-th time" is totally fine and clear enough. We can escalate that internally. But generalizing Renesas and ignoring that there are individual people there, trying to fix way more issues than this particular one, is what I percieved from your responses and what I considered above the line. And yes, I am aware that you are also doing a hell of a job going through all these DT and binding patches which I think are difficult to review. For me, we are entering the space where we can leave it like this and maybe discuss details over a drink at the next conference. You are invited then! Happy hacking, Wolfram
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
