On 27/03/2025 10:08, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Thu, 27 Mar 2025 at 09:55, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Thu, 27 Mar 2025 at 08:43, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> On 26/03/2025 15:39, Prabhakar wrote: >>>> From: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>> >>>> Enable support for the Renesas RZ/V2N (R9A09G056) SoC in the ARM64 >>>> defconfig. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>> --- >>>> arch/arm64/configs/defconfig | 1 + >>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) >>>> >>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig b/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig >>>> index 11e7d0ad8656..c7b41f86c128 100644 >>>> --- a/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig >>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig >>>> @@ -1483,6 +1483,7 @@ CONFIG_ARCH_R9A07G054=y >>>> CONFIG_ARCH_R9A08G045=y >>>> CONFIG_ARCH_R9A09G011=y >>>> CONFIG_ARCH_R9A09G047=y >>>> +CONFIG_ARCH_R9A09G056=y >>> >>> So the pattern will keep growing and none of you will ever bother to fix >>> it, because you have your patchset to throw over the wall. >> >> Yes, the pattern will keep on growing. >> Just like the minimum kernel size will keep on growing, especially if >> you can no longer compile a kernel without support for SoCs you do not >> intend to run the kernel on. Not everyone has GiBs of RAM to spare... > > <pling! :-> > > /me remembers > https://lore.kernel.org/all/6323eb7a-03e9-4678-ac4f-f90052d0aace@xxxxxxxxxx/ Exactly that discussion and that outcome. Best regards, Krzysztof
