Hi Krzysztof,
On Thu, 27 Feb 2025 at 12:48, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 27/02/2025 11:48, Thierry Bultel wrote:
> >> This is fine, I am not against fine-grained SoC-enable options. However
> >> all your SoCs should be enabled by default (default y if ARCH_RENESAS or
> >> any other option which works for you) thus you won't be growing user-
> >> selectable choices.
> >>
> >> Strictly speaking this still will be choice, because you need to trim
> >> config, but all people and all distros will just ignore it and don't see
> >> it in defconfig.
> >>
> >
> > I understand.
> >
> > All the ARCH_XXX SoC options are already under a menuconfig section, which
> > is defaulted to 'y' if ARCH_RENESAS.
>
> Indeed and it actually cannot have "if ARCH_RENESAS" due to how compile
> test is enabled there.
Sorry, I don't get what you mean here...
> > So I guess that this simple additional change would make it:
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/soc/renesas/Kconfig b/drivers/soc/renesas/Kconfig
> > index 91a815e0a522..231880c21aa7 100644
> > --- a/drivers/soc/renesas/Kconfig
> > +++ b/drivers/soc/renesas/Kconfig
> > @@ -358,6 +358,7 @@ config ARCH_R9A09G057
> >
> > config ARCH_R9A09G077
> > bool "ARM64 Platform support for RZ/T2H"
> > + default y
Please add "if ARCH_RENESAS" iff we decide to go this route...
> > help
> > This enables support for the Renesas RZ/T2H SoC variants.
>
> Yes and then run savedefconfig and check if defconfig needs this symbol.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
