On Tue, Sep 02, 2025 at 05:12:24PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 02/09/2025 15:15, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 02, 2025 at 01:59:21PM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
...
> >> + for (i = 0; i < soc_data->nfunctions; i++) {
> >> + func = &soc_data->functions[i];
> >> +
> >> + ret = pinmux_generic_add_pinfunction(pctrl->pctrl, func, NULL);
> >> + if (ret < 0)
> >
> > Why not simply
> >
> > if (ret)
>
> Because existing code is as readable?
I don't agree on this. And Bart explained why. So, it's an API requirement
after all.
> This is just some serious
> nitpicking which is not actually helping at all at v7.
Agree, this comment is a nit-pick which can be ignored at v7 stage.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
