RE: [PATCH] pinctrl: renesas: rzg2l: Fix ISEL restore on resume

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



HI Caludiu,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@xxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: 11 September 2025 14:24
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: renesas: rzg2l: Fix ISEL restore on resume
> 
> Hi, Biju,
> 
> On 9/11/25 13:43, Biju Das wrote:
> > Hi Claudiu,
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Claudiu <claudiu.beznea@xxxxxxxxx>
> >> Sent: 08 September 2025 15:43
> >> Subject: [PATCH] pinctrl: renesas: rzg2l: Fix ISEL restore on resume
> >>
> >> From: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea.uj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>
> >> Commit 1d2da79708cb ("pinctrl: renesas: rzg2l: Avoid configuring ISEL
> >> in
> >> gpio_irq_{en,dis}able*()") dropped the configuration of ISEL from
> >> rzg2l_gpio_irq_enable()/rzg2l_gpio_irq_disable() and moved it to
> >> rzg2l_gpio_child_to_parent_hwirq()/rzg2l_gpio_irq_domain_free() to fix spurious IRQs.
> >>
> >> The resume code used rzg2l_gpio_irq_enable() (called from
> >> rzg2l_gpio_irq_restore()) to reconfigure the wakeup interrupts. Some
> >> drivers (e.g. Ethernet) may also reconfigure interrupts in their own
> >> code, eventually calling rzg2l_gpio_irq_enable(), when these are not wakeup interrupts.
> >>
> >> After commit 1d2da79708cb ("pinctrl: renesas: rzg2l: Avoid
> >> configuring ISEL in gpio_irq_{en,dis}able*()"), ISEL was no longer configured properly after resume.
> >>
> >> Fix this by adding rzg2l_gpio_irq_endisable() back into
> >> rzg2l_gpio_irq_enable(), and by using its unlocked variant in
> >> rzg2l_gpio_irq_restore(). Having IRQs enable in
> >> rzg2l_gpio_irq_enable() should be safe with respect to spurious IRQs,
> >> as in the probe case IRQs are enabled anyway in rzg2l_gpio_child_to_parent_hwirq(). No spurious IRQs
> were detected on suspend/resume tests (executed on RZ/G3S).
> >
> > IIRC, I believe the issue is ISEL is not restored during resume.
> 
> Yes
> 
> > Can we restore this register just like Schmitt register
> > suspend/restore[1]
> 
> The IA55 would have to be configured for interrupts as well. Doing it in other order will lead to
> spurious interrupts while resuming. The commit 254203f9a94c ("pinctrl: renesas: rzg2l: Add
> suspend/resume support") that introduced this approach, mentions the following:
> 
>     Because interrupt signals are routed to IA55 interrupt controller and
>     IA55 interrupt controller resumes before pin controller, patch restores
>     also the configured interrupts just after pin settings are restored to
>     avoid invalid interrupts while resuming.

OK. So enable/disable Keep ISEL configuration as it is, so the pin gpio int always.
Which commit 1d2da79708cb ("pinctrl: renesas: rzg2l: Avoidconfiguring ISEL in gpio_irq_{en,dis}able*()")
is doing.

The new addition is suspend/resume restores ISEL along with reconfiguring interrupts.

Is it correct?

Cheers,
Biju







[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SOC]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux