Re: [PATCH 113/114] clk: sophgo: sg2042-pll: remove round_rate() in favor of determine_rate()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Brian!

On Mon, 2025-08-11 at 11:19 -0400, Brian Masney via B4 Relay wrote:
> From: Brian Masney <bmasney@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> This driver implements both the determine_rate() and round_rate() clk
> ops, and the round_rate() clk ops is deprecated. When both are defined,
> clk_core_determine_round_nolock() from the clk core will only use the
> determine_rate() clk ops, so let's remove the round_rate() clk ops since
> it's unused.
> 
> The implementation of sg2042_clk_pll_determine_rate() calls
> sg2042_clk_pll_round_rate(), so this folds the two into a single
> function.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Brian Masney <bmasney@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/clk/sophgo/clk-sg2042-pll.c | 24 ++++++++----------------
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/sophgo/clk-sg2042-pll.c b/drivers/clk/sophgo/clk-sg2042-pll.c
> index e5fb0bb7ac4f97616f3b472fcab45e5729eb653e..b2cbd50ac73c7538b1acbca517f4259cba885fcc 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/sophgo/clk-sg2042-pll.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/sophgo/clk-sg2042-pll.c
> @@ -346,37 +346,30 @@ static unsigned long sg2042_clk_pll_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
>  	return rate;
>  }
>  
> -static long sg2042_clk_pll_round_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
> -				      unsigned long req_rate,
> -				      unsigned long *prate)
> +static int sg2042_clk_pll_determine_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
> +					 struct clk_rate_request *req)
>  {
>  	struct sg2042_pll_ctrl pctrl_table;
>  	unsigned int value;
>  	long proper_rate;
>  	int ret;
>  
> -	ret = sg2042_get_pll_ctl_setting(&pctrl_table, req_rate, *prate);
> +	ret = sg2042_get_pll_ctl_setting(&pctrl_table,
> +					 min(req->rate, req->max_rate),
> +					 req->best_parent_rate);
>  	if (ret) {
>  		proper_rate = 0;
>  		goto out;
>  	}
>  
>  	value = sg2042_pll_ctrl_encode(&pctrl_table);
> -	proper_rate = (long)sg2042_pll_recalc_rate(value, *prate);
> +	proper_rate = (long)sg2042_pll_recalc_rate(value, req->best_parent_rate);
>  
>  out:
>  	pr_debug("--> %s: pll_round_rate: val = %ld\n",
                          ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Now that round_rate has gone, should the above become "pll_determine_rate"?

>  		 clk_hw_get_name(hw), proper_rate);
> -	return proper_rate;
> -}
> +	req->rate = proper_rate;
>  
> -static int sg2042_clk_pll_determine_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
> -					 struct clk_rate_request *req)
> -{
> -	req->rate = sg2042_clk_pll_round_rate(hw, min(req->rate, req->max_rate),
> -					      &req->best_parent_rate);
> -	pr_debug("--> %s: pll_determine_rate: val = %ld\n",
> -		 clk_hw_get_name(hw), req->rate);
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> @@ -417,14 +410,13 @@ static int sg2042_clk_pll_set_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
>  
>  static const struct clk_ops sg2042_clk_pll_ops = {
>  	.recalc_rate = sg2042_clk_pll_recalc_rate,
> -	.round_rate = sg2042_clk_pll_round_rate,
>  	.determine_rate = sg2042_clk_pll_determine_rate,
>  	.set_rate = sg2042_clk_pll_set_rate,
>  };
>  
>  static const struct clk_ops sg2042_clk_pll_ro_ops = {
>  	.recalc_rate = sg2042_clk_pll_recalc_rate,
> -	.round_rate = sg2042_clk_pll_round_rate,
> +	.determine_rate = sg2042_clk_pll_determine_rate,
>  };

-- 
Alexander Sverdlin.





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SOC]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux