Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] pinctrl: renesas: Add support for RZ/T2H

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Prabhakar,

On Fri, 1 Aug 2025 at 17:46, Prabhakar <prabhakar.csengg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> From: Thierry Bultel <thierry.bultel.yh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Add the pinctrl and gpio driver for RZ/T2H
>
> Signed-off-by: Thierry Bultel <thierry.bultel.yh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Co-developed-by: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> v3->v4:
> - No changes
>
> v2->v3:
> - Fixed Kconfig dependency.
> - Added dependency for 64bit to avoid build errors on 32bit systems.
> - Included bitfield.h

Thanks for the update!

Seems like several of my review comments on v1 were missed.

> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/renesas/pinctrl-rzt2h.c

> +#define PM_MASK                        GENMASK(1, 0)
> +#define PM_PIN_MASK(pin)       (PM_MASK << ((pin) * 2))

Please move PM_INPUT and PM_OUTPUT here, and insert a blank line
between the PM_* and PFC_* definitions.

> +#define PFC_MASK               GENMASK_ULL(5, 0)
> +#define PFC_PIN_MASK(pin)      (PFC_MASK << ((pin) * 8))
> +
> +#define PM_INPUT       0x01

BIT(0)

> +#define PM_OUTPUT      0x02

BIT(1)

> +struct rzt2h_pinctrl_data {
> +       const char * const *port_pins;

Do you need this? It always points rzt2h_gpio_names[].

> +       unsigned int n_port_pins;
> +       const u8 *port_pin_configs;
> +       unsigned int n_ports;
> +};
> +
> +struct rzt2h_pinctrl {
> +       struct pinctrl_dev              *pctl;
> +       struct pinctrl_desc             desc;
> +       struct pinctrl_pin_desc         *pins;
> +       const struct rzt2h_pinctrl_data *data;
> +       void __iomem                    *base0, *base1;
> +       struct device                   *dev;
> +       struct gpio_chip                gpio_chip;
> +       struct pinctrl_gpio_range       gpio_range;
> +       spinlock_t                      lock;
> +       struct mutex                    mutex;

Please add comments to these two locks, to clarify what they are
protecting against.

> +       bool                            safety_port_enabled;
> +};
> +
> +#define RZT2H_PINCTRL_REG_ACCESS(size, type) \
> +static inline void rzt2h_pinctrl_write##size(struct rzt2h_pinctrl *pctrl, u8 port, \
> +                                            type val, u16 offset) \

unsigned int offset?

> +{ \
> +       if (port > RZT2H_MAX_SAFETY_PORTS) \
> +               write##size(val, pctrl->base0 + offset); \
> +       else \
> +               write##size(val, pctrl->base1 + offset); \
> +} \
> +\
> +static inline type rzt2h_pinctrl_read##size(struct rzt2h_pinctrl *pctrl, u8 port, u16 offset) \

Likewise

> +{ \
> +       if (port > RZT2H_MAX_SAFETY_PORTS) \
> +               return read##size(pctrl->base0 + offset); \
> +       else \
> +               return read##size(pctrl->base1 + offset); \
> +}

> +static int rzt2h_validate_pin(struct rzt2h_pinctrl *pctrl, unsigned int offset)
> +{
> +       u8 port = RZT2H_PIN_ID_TO_PORT(offset);
> +       u8 pin = RZT2H_PIN_ID_TO_PIN(offset);
> +       u8 pincfg;
> +
> +       if (offset >= pctrl->data->n_port_pins || port >= pctrl->data->n_ports)
> +               return -EINVAL;
> +
> +       if (!pctrl->safety_port_enabled && port <= RZT2H_MAX_SAFETY_PORTS)
> +               return -EINVAL;
> +
> +       pincfg = pctrl->data->port_pin_configs[port];
> +       return (pincfg & (1 << pin)) ? 0 : -EINVAL;

BIT(pin)

> +}
> +

> +static int rzt2h_pinctrl_set_mux(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
> +                                unsigned int func_selector,
> +                                unsigned int group_selector)
> +{
> +       struct rzt2h_pinctrl *pctrl = pinctrl_dev_get_drvdata(pctldev);
> +       struct function_desc *func;
> +       struct group_desc *group;
> +       const unsigned int *pins;
> +       unsigned int i;
> +       u8 *psel_val;
> +       int ret;
> +
> +       func = pinmux_generic_get_function(pctldev, func_selector);
> +       if (!func)
> +               return -EINVAL;
> +       group = pinctrl_generic_get_group(pctldev, group_selector);
> +       if (!group)
> +               return -EINVAL;
> +
> +       psel_val = func->data;
> +       pins = group->grp.pins;
> +
> +       for (i = 0; i < group->grp.npins; i++) {
> +               dev_dbg(pctrl->dev, "port:%u pin: %u PSEL:%u\n",

Please use consistent spacing around colons.

> +                       RZT2H_PIN_ID_TO_PORT(pins[i]), RZT2H_PIN_ID_TO_PIN(pins[i]),
> +                       psel_val[i]);
> +               ret = rzt2h_validate_pin(pctrl, pins[i]);
> +               if (ret)
> +                       return ret;

Please insert a blank line.

> +               rzt2h_pinctrl_set_pfc_mode(pctrl, RZT2H_PIN_ID_TO_PORT(pins[i]),
> +                                          RZT2H_PIN_ID_TO_PIN(pins[i]), psel_val[i]);
> +       }
> +
> +       return 0;
> +};

> +static int rzt2h_gpio_get_direction(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int offset)
> +{
> +       struct rzt2h_pinctrl *pctrl = gpiochip_get_data(chip);
> +       u8 port = RZT2H_PIN_ID_TO_PORT(offset);
> +       u8 bit = RZT2H_PIN_ID_TO_PIN(offset);
> +       int ret;
> +
> +       ret = rzt2h_validate_pin(pctrl, offset);
> +       if (ret)
> +               return ret;
> +
> +       if (!(rzt2h_pinctrl_readb(pctrl, port, PMC(port)) & BIT(bit))) {

Invert the logic and return early, to reduce indentation?

> +               u16 reg;
> +
> +               reg = rzt2h_pinctrl_readw(pctrl, port, PM(port));
> +               reg = (reg >> (bit * 2)) & PM_MASK;
> +               if (reg == PM_OUTPUT)

The hardware supports enabling both input and output, so I think you
better check for "reg & PM_OUTPUT".

> +                       return GPIO_LINE_DIRECTION_OUT;
> +               if (reg == PM_INPUT)
> +                       return GPIO_LINE_DIRECTION_IN;
> +       }
> +
> +       return -EINVAL;
> +}

> +static int rzt2h_gpio_get(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int offset)
> +{
> +       struct rzt2h_pinctrl *pctrl = gpiochip_get_data(chip);
> +       u8 port = RZT2H_PIN_ID_TO_PORT(offset);
> +       u8 bit = RZT2H_PIN_ID_TO_PIN(offset);
> +       u16 reg;
> +
> +       reg = rzt2h_pinctrl_readw(pctrl, port, PM(port));
> +       reg = (reg >> (bit * 2)) & PM_MASK;
> +
> +       if (reg == PM_INPUT)

"if (reg & PM_INPUT)", to handle both PM_INPUT and PM_OUTPUT set?

> +               return !!(rzt2h_pinctrl_readb(pctrl, port, PIN(port)) & BIT(bit));
> +       if (reg == PM_OUTPUT)
> +               return !!(rzt2h_pinctrl_readb(pctrl, port, P(port)) & BIT(bit));
> +       return -EINVAL;
> +}

> +static int rzt2h_pinctrl_register(struct rzt2h_pinctrl *pctrl)
> +{
> +       struct pinctrl_desc *desc = &pctrl->desc;
> +       struct device *dev = pctrl->dev;
> +       struct pinctrl_pin_desc *pins;
> +       unsigned int i, j;
> +       u8 *pin_data;
> +       int ret;
> +
> +       desc->name = DRV_NAME;
> +       desc->npins = pctrl->data->n_port_pins;
> +       desc->pctlops = &rzt2h_pinctrl_pctlops;
> +       desc->pmxops = &rzt2h_pinctrl_pmxops;
> +       desc->owner = THIS_MODULE;
> +
> +       pins = devm_kcalloc(dev, desc->npins, sizeof(*pins), GFP_KERNEL);
> +       if (!pins)
> +               return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +       pin_data = devm_kcalloc(dev, desc->npins,
> +                               sizeof(*pin_data), GFP_KERNEL);

Fits on a single line.

> +       if (!pin_data)
> +               return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +       pctrl->pins = pins;
> +       desc->pins = pins;
> +
> +       for (i = 0, j = 0; i < pctrl->data->n_port_pins; i++) {
> +               pins[i].number = i;
> +               pins[i].name = pctrl->data->port_pins[i];
> +               if (i && !(i % RZT2H_PINS_PER_PORT))
> +                       j++;
> +               pin_data[i] = pctrl->data->port_pin_configs[j];
> +               pins[i].drv_data = &pin_data[i];

Where is this used?

> +       }
> +
> +       ret = devm_pinctrl_register_and_init(dev, desc, pctrl, &pctrl->pctl);
> +       if (ret)
> +               return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "pinctrl registration failed\n");
> +
> +       ret = pinctrl_enable(pctrl->pctl);
> +       if (ret)
> +               return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "pinctrl enable failed\n");
> +
> +       return rzt2h_gpio_register(pctrl);
> +}
> +
> +static int rzt2h_pinctrl_cfg_regions(struct platform_device *pdev,
> +                                    struct rzt2h_pinctrl *pctrl)
> +{
> +       pctrl->base0 = devm_platform_ioremap_resource_byname(pdev, "nsr");
> +       if (IS_ERR(pctrl->base0))
> +               return PTR_ERR(pctrl->base0);
> +
> +       pctrl->base1 = devm_platform_ioremap_resource_byname(pdev, "srs");

When the optional "srs" region is missing, it is ignored by the
code below, but __devm_ioremap_resource() will still have printed
an error message.  So you either have to open-code this using
platform_get_resource_byname() and devm_ioremap_resource() here, or
create a static devm_platform_ioremap_resource_byname_optional()
helper that does the same, or go for a public helper directly.

> +       if (IS_ERR(pctrl->base1)) {
> +               if (PTR_ERR(pctrl->base1) != -EINVAL)
> +                       return PTR_ERR(pctrl->base1);
> +       } else {
> +               u8 port;
> +
> +               pctrl->safety_port_enabled = true;
> +
> +               /* Configure to select safety region 0x812c0xxx */
> +               for (port = 0; port <= RZT2H_MAX_SAFETY_PORTS; port++)
> +                       writeb(0x0, pctrl->base1 + RSELP(port));
> +       }
> +
> +       return 0;
> +}

> +static const u8 r9a09g077_gpio_configs[] = {
> +       0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff,
> +       0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff,
> +       0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0x7f,
> +};

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

-- 
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SOC]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux