Re: [PATCH v2 7/9] watchdog: rzv2h: Set min_timeout based on max_hw_heartbeat_ms

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 8/1/25 08:30, Lad, Prabhakar wrote:
Hi Guenter,

On Fri, Aug 1, 2025 at 2:52 PM Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On 8/1/25 04:05, Lad, Prabhakar wrote:
Hi Wolfram,

Thank you for the review.

On Fri, Aug 1, 2025 at 5:10 AM Wolfram Sang
<wsa+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Tue, Jul 29, 2025 at 04:59:13PM +0100, Prabhakar wrote:
From: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Update the watchdog minimum timeout value to be derived from
`max_hw_heartbeat_ms` using `DIV_ROUND_UP()` to ensure a valid and
consistent minimum timeout in seconds.

I don't understand this change. Why is the _minimum_ timeout based on
the _maximum_ heartbeat?

The reason for deriving min_timeout from max_hw_heartbeat_ms is to
ensure the minimum watchdog period (in seconds) is compatible with the
underlying hardware.

max_hw_heartbeat_ms is calculated as:
max_hw_heartbeat_ms = (1000 * 16384 * cks_div) / clk_rate;

This value varies by SoC:
   RZ/T2H: cks_div = 8192, clk ≈ 62.5 MHz -> max_hw_heartbeat_ms ~ 2147ms
   RZ/V2H: cks_div = 256, clk ≈ 240 MHz -> max_hw_heartbeat_ms ~ 174ms

Since min_timeout is in seconds, setting it to:
min_timeout = DIV_ROUND_UP(max_hw_heartbeat_ms, 1000);

ensures:
The minimum timeout period is never less than what the hardware can support.
- For T2H, this results in a min_timeout of 3s (2147ms -> 3s).
- For V2H, it’s just 1s (174ms -> 1s).


Sorry, I completely fail to understand the logic.

If the maximum timeout is, say, 2 seconds, why would the hardware
not be able to support a timeout of 1 second ?

The watchdog timer on RZ/V2H (and RZ/T2H) is a 14 bit down counter. On
initialization the down counters on the SoCs are configured to the max
down counter. On RZ/V2H down counter value 4194304 (which evaluates to
174ms) is and on RZ/T2H is 134217728 (which evaluates to 2147ms). The
board will be reset when we get an underflow error.

So for example on T2H consider this example:
- down counter is 134217728
- min_timeout is set to 1 in the driver
- When set  WDIOC_SETTIMEOUT to 1
In this case the board will be reset after 2147ms, i.e. incorrect
behaviour as we expect the board to be reset after 1 sec. Hence the
min_timeout is set to 3s (2147ms -> 3s).

Please let me know if my understanding of min_timeout is incorrect here.


The driver is missing a set_timeout function. It should set RZ/T2H
to 62514079 if a timeout of 1 second is configured.

Guenter





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SOC]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux