> > + interrupt-names: > > + items: > > + - const: ierr > > + - const: terr > > + - const: abort > > + - const: resp > > + - const: cmd > > + - const: ibi > > + - const: rx > > + - const: tx > > + - const: rcv > > + - const: st > > + - const: sp > > + - const: tend > > + - const: nack > > + - const: al > > + - const: tmo > > + - const: wu > > + - const: exit > > + minItems: 16 > > + > > + clocks: > > + oneOf: > > + - items: > > + - description: APB bus clock > > + - description: transfer clock > > + - items: > > + - description: APB bus clock > > + - description: SFRs clock > > + - description: transfer clock > > It's a new binding, why don't you put SFRs clock last and simplify the > schema? Similar how we handle interrupts? 16 for the one SoC, 17 for the other? Putting the optional entry to the end of the array? Tommaso, can you integrate this change, please?
