Hi tglx and Miquèl, On Tue, Jun 24 2025 at 16:13, tglx wrote: > As you cited correctly I said back then: > > "So there is certainly an argument to be made that this particular > function should print a well formatted and informative error > message." > > This particular function is: devm_request_threaded_irq(). > > IOW, I did not ask you should go an create a new one, right? Thank you all for your valuable feedback and guidance regarding the recent patch. I am a bit confused because, in the v1 version, no new function was added. However, in v2, tglx suggested introducing a new function[1]. Now, I would greatly appreciate your advice on the appropriate approach: Should we directly integrate dev_err_probe() inside devm_request_threaded_irq()? Or should we create a wrapper function instead? Thank you for your guidance. [1]https://lore.kernel.org/all/87h6qpyzkd.ffs@tglx/ Thanks, PanChuang